Files

86 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

## 1. Structural analysis \& mapping
**Identify the precise mapping** between XML elements and Compose equivalents.
You must determine:
- The exact `@Composable` functions (e.g., `ConstraintLayout`, `Column`, `LazyColumn`) that replace the XML tag hierarchy.
- The specific parameters and `Modifier` extensions required to replicate XML attributes (e.g., `layout_width`, `padding`, `elevation`).
- The appropriate state management strategy for interactive elements.
## 2. Migration execution
**Convert the XML layout code to Jetpack Compose**, ensuring the visual
hierarchy and layout logic are preserved while leveraging Compose's declarative
nature.
## 3. Theming \& design system integrity
**Do not use hard-coded values.** Follow these rules for styling:
- **Token Alignment:** Cross-reference XML dimensions, colors, and style attributes with the existing Compose `Theme` (e.g., `MaterialTheme.colorScheme` or custom design system tokens).
- **Reuse over Creation:** If matching values exist in the current Compose theme, reuse them. If a value is missing but required for the design, define it within the theme structure rather than hard-coding it in the Composable.
- **Project Consistency:** You **MUST** strictly adhere to existing code conventions, naming standards, and implementation patterns found in the project. **Prioritize** project-specific reusable components over generic Material defaults.
## 4. Component layering \& reusability
Evaluate if the XML layout serves as a foundation-level design system component
(reused across the app with a distinct role). If it is:
- **Create a reusable composable:** Do not just inline the code. Define a new standalone `@Composable`.
- **Parameterization:** Expose specific parameters for variable data (text, colors, styles) and use `Modifier` for layout-specific customizations.
- **Feature parity \& restriction:** Ensure the new composable enforces the same UI constraints as the original XML component, preventing unauthorized style overrides while maintaining the intended flexibility.
Example before migration:
<style
name="Widget.Rounded.Button"
parent="Widget.Button.Borderless">
<item name="android:fontFamily">sans-serif-medium</item>
<item name="android:minWidth">@dimen/min_width</item>
<item name="android:paddingStart">@dimen/padding_2</item>
<item name="android:paddingEnd">@dimen/padding_2</item>
<item name="cornerRadius">8dp</item>
</style>
Example after migration:
```kotlin
@Composable
fun RoundedBorderlessButton(
text: String,
onClick: () -> Unit,
modifier: Modifier = Modifier,
enabled: Boolean = true
) {
TextButton(
onClick, modifier
.defaultMinSize(minWidth = dimensionResource(R.dimen.min_width))
.padding(
start = dimensionResource(R.dimen.padding_2),
end = dimensionResource(R.dimen.padding_2)
), enabled, shape = RoundedCornerShape(8.dp),
colors = ButtonDefaults.textButtonColors(
contentColor = MaterialTheme.colorScheme.primary
)
) {
Text(
text = text,
style = MaterialTheme.typography.bodyMedium.copy(
fontFamily = FontFamily.SansSerif,
fontWeight = FontWeight.Medium
)
)
}
}
```
<br />
*** ** * ** ***
## 5. Output requirements
- Provide the full Kotlin file content.
- Include necessary imports.
- Add documentation comments (`/** ... */`) explaining the mapping logic for complex transformations.